The volume and size of the hoops you need to jump through depends on the number of credit card transactions you do.  So at least if you are a small charity taking relatively few credit card payments, you won’t have to meet the same high-cost audit requirements of the huge retail organisations.  Here is a very brief summary of the criteria you need to meet:

Level 1 – If you take over 6 million transactions a year, or your data has previously been compromised

• Annual Onsite Security Audit  – either reviewed by a specially qualified adviser or (by prior agreement with your merchant provider) an Internal Audit signed by an officer of the company
• Quarterly network security scan by an Approved Scanning Vendor (ASV)

Level 2 – If you take 1,000,000 to 6 million transactions a year

• Annual Self Assessment Questionnaire
• Quarterly Scan by an Approved Scanning Vendor (ASV)

Level 3 – If you take 20,000 to 1,000,000 transactions a year

• Quarterly Scan by an Approved Scanning Vendor (ASV)
• Annual Self Assessment Questionnaire

Level 4 – If you take less than 20,000 transactions

• Annual Self Assessment Questionnaire
• Possible Quarterly Scan by an Approved Scanning Vendor (depends on your merchant providers specific requirements)

As you can see from the list above, even though PCI DSS is (supposedly at least) an agreed standard, it’s interpretation depends on your specific merchant provider – and so you need to double-check with them as to the exact requirements your charity needs to meet.

If you are not an IT compliance expert, the whole Self Assessment Questionnaire and Quarterly Scan thing can appear incredibly scary and time consuming. 

There are a number of qualified experts our there (QAS) who can help,  and if you take enough credit card transactions to need to meet the higher level criteria you are probably going to want to ask for their help, but (due to the training, certification and insurance requirements they themselves need to maintain) their services are not particularly cheap.  So for smaller organisations, a DIY approach, probably with help from your internal or external IT experts, is going to be the most likely route to take.

As well as consulting your IT experts, there are a number of organisations who provide “fill in the gaps” type toolkits to help you complete your PCI DSS requirements with the minimum of pain, and a number of organisations who can provide those quarterly scans for a relatively low charge.  Here are a couple we have looked at, an internet search will no doubt yield a lot more:

• IT Governance PCI Toolkit -  A specially designed toolkit to help payment card-accepting organisations quickly create all the documentation required to affirmatively answer the requirements of the PCI DSS as set out in the Self Assessment Questionnaire (v1.2), containing a full set of documentation templates for the all mandatory PCI DSS policies.
     
• IT Governance ASV Scanning Service - Provides a fixed yearly contract service for scans by an Approved Scanning Vendor based on number of external IP addresses to be scanned – prices (at time of writing) from £165 for a one year contract for 10 scans per quarter across up to 5 IP addresses

If you store, process or transmit any cardholder data electronically or manually, then your organisation needs to comply with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) – and prove it - by 1st September this year.  And if your organisation doesn’t comply, you run the risk of a massive fine.

PCI DSS is a set of comprehensive requirements for enhancing payment account data security.  It was developed by the founding payment brands of the PCI Security Standards Council, including American Express, Discover Financial Services, JCB International, MasterCard Worldwide and Visa Inc. Inc. International, in order to ensure the broad adoption of consistent data security measures on a global basis.

It is a multifaceted security standard that includes requirements for security management, policies, procedures, network architecture, software design and other critical protective measures – all designed to help proactively protect customer account data. 

It includes a whole range of requirements, including rules about what data you can and cannot store and what levels of security your organisation and systems network must meet.

It is important  realise that it covers your entire trading environment, including all third-party partners that store, process or transmit data for you as part of your credit card payment process.  Third parties include:

You can’t just assume that your website host or any third-party organisation you use will deal with this – the buck stops with you and you will need to make sure that all your providers, facilities and software comply before you can achieve compliance. 

More to follow soon ….

This time round we take a look at the most common methods available to send out “bulk” emails,  i.e.  emails to many recipients (like newsletters and appeals) as opposed to just a few recipients. 

There are three major ways of sending out bulk emails:

• Via your own email client (like Outlook) – either by placing all recipients in the BCC field or by using an email distribution list
   
• Via  a program specifically designed for sending bulk emails that is installed on a PC or server at your offices
   
• Via a specialist bulk email sending company like AWeber, Constant Contact or Sign-Up.to

All have pros and cons.  Here are some of the key ones and our personal advice on where you can benefit – or slip up – using each of them.

Your own email client

Pros:

• It’s immediately available – probably already running on your desktop, so nothing more to pay.
   
• You already know how to use it.

Cons:

• It is incredibly easy to make a mistake and put recipient addressed in the To or CC field of the email – meaning that every recipients email address is sent to every person and your organisation has instantly breached both UK Data Protection laws and spam laws in every continent!
   
• You need to remember to put in the legal “stuff” (like registered addresses and unsubscription links) in to each email.
   
• You need to manage subscribe and unsubscribe requests yourself.
   
• Emails to more than a few recipients are likely to get blocked by the spam filters on your local PC or your email server.
   
• The sudden volume of outbound emails may be a lot for your email server to handle all at one time, resulting in other day-to-day emails being delayed while you server works to handle your mailing.
   
• If you mess anything up and your email domain gets onto any spam blacklists, you may well stop all email from your organisation from getting through and bring email communication to a total halt until you can get your organisations email server de-listed.
  Even if you do it perfectly, someone can still report you for spam and it will be up to you to prove your innocence.   In the world of spam blacklisting you are sadly often deemed guilty until proven innocent!
   
• You will need to understand what all the non-delivery reports you get back mean in order to manage re-sends and mail list removals.
  If you don’t know the difference between a “hard bounce” and a “soft bounce” – and their error codes – and what you need to do if you get one or more of each type to an email address within a certain time period to keep on the right-side of spam laws, then this probably isn’t the right solution for you!

Our view:

We wouldn’t recommend this unless you only have a few (under 50) subscribers and really understand what you are doing when it comes to email legalities and email delivery and error report codes.
 

Dedicated bulk email program on your PC

Pros:

• They are relatively cheap to buy and you don’t have many (if any) further costs.
   
• They are relatively easy to use and many provide additional features – to help you design good looking emails for example or to automatically add the “legal” bits for example.

Cons:

• Most of the disadvantages listed above for personal email clients (other than the first one).
   
• By default, most use their own email server software to send and track emails, so you need to make sure that any anti-spam settings on your outward server (or even possibly your ISP) are configured to expect bulk emails from it.
   
• Not all of them are particularly accurate at tracking whether emails have reached their destination or not. As well as messing up your statistics, this can lead to you re-sending emails that were incorrectly reported as not having gone through but really had done – leading to subscribers receiving multiple copies which at best will annoy them and at worst may see you being incorrectly reported as a spammer.
   
• If your email recipients are split over several lists, not all of them are able to flag up duplicate sends where the same email address it in multiple lists – which means that subscribers receive multiple copies, with the same results as above.
   

Our view:

This can be a cheap and effective solution.  But you really understand what you are doing when it comes to email legalities and email delivery and error report codes.  If a paid member of staff is handling this, don’t forget to take into consideration the cost of their time learning and administering the program into account – these “hidden” ongoing costs can mean that this isn’t always the cheap and easy solution it appears to be.

Specialist bulk email sending company

Pros:

• They handle all the “legal bits” for you – all you need to worry about is the content!
   
• They have their own email deliver servers, which are specially designed to handle large volumes of emails quickly and efficiently.
   
• Most provide easy to use software for designing your emails as part of the package.
   
• Some include special checking software that you can run to ensure that your email isn’t likely to fall foul of spam filters or other reasons for non-delivery.
   
• Their software automatically handles subscribe and unsubscribe requests for you.
   
• Most provide extra email features like auto-responders that allow follow-up messages to be scheduled and sent automatically.
   
• Some include integration to other information delivery methods such as Twitter and Facebook, allowing you to reach donors and supporters in many different mediums via one single place.
   
• Most include tracking and analytical tools that enable you to quickly and easy monitor deliver and read rates – and report and analyse trends over time or a particular campaign.
   
• If anyone should make a spam complaint about one of your emails sent using one of these services, the company will help sort things out.  And in the meantime, your own organisations day-to-day email won’t be affected.
   

Cons:

• Some offer low price (or free) trials for low subscriber numbers and/or time periods, but after that you will need to pay a monthly or yearly charge which depending on your subscriber numbers (and how often you mail then) can be significant – so costs can mount up unexpectedly if you don’t keep an eye on numbers.
   
• In order to ensure that they stay on the right side of spam legislation (and don’t have their other customers emails blocked) most impose restrictions on the methods by which you can add subscribers.  Though uploading your existing subscriber-base should be no problem, many require that new subscribers are added using “double opt-in” and some specifically ban you from using emails from purchased marketing email lists.
   
• Your subscriber data (email name at minimum) needs to be stored on their servers, so you (or subscribers) may have concerns about privacy or data confidentiality.  In practice this isn’t normally a real problem at all (all the specialist companies have tight security procedures) but there may be a perceived risk.  And if you are using a company whose servers are not based in the UK, you may need to check (and possibly amend) your own organisations published privacy policy.
   
• You are not totally in control of the whole email delivery mechanism – which some organisation may not be comfortable with.  Also subscribers may worry that their email address has been shared with others if  they see a mention of another organisation at the end of your emails (like the Sign-Up.to one at the end of our newsletters) or when subscribing or unsubscribing.  In practice, most internet users are well used to this concept and unworried by it, but if your subscriber base is more conservative or less “internet savvy” then you might need to give them extra reassurance.
   

Our view:

If you have thousands of subscribers, this probably the only practical solution unless you want to employ (or train to be) an email delivery specialist and your email servers really have the capacity to handle the huge volume of email. 

If you have fewer subscribers, you need to balance the benefits against the costs.  Make  sure you take into account not only the time spent sending the emails, but the measured risk to your organisation if you did end up on a spam blacklist – and the time and effort to get off it, which after having to do this for other organisations ourselves we can vouch can be a painful and costly process and one which is best avoided!

Though we are IT specialists and a lot of our time is spent working with email delivery in some shape form (so we do have some level of expertise in this area), this is the solution we choose to use ourselves.  Even though our mailing list is pretty tiny compared to some of the organisations we work with, we still find that outsourcing this part of our communication to an outside specialist organisation saves us time and money overall.

This time we cover two key ways in which you can keep your mail files down to a manageable size – without resorting to mass deletion of emails you would really like to keep.  Again these solutions are only applicable if your emails get delivered to personal mail files – if your mail stays on the server then other solutions will be required.  If you are not sure, then ask your system administrator – or us!

Each of the methods we suggest has its own advantages and disadvantages. Opinion on which one is best is divided – even amongst the Charity Solutions team.  You will need to pick the one that you think will work best for you and best matches any data handling procedures your organisation has in place.  If you don’t like it, you can always change later – but the main thing is to do something now - before your mailbox explodes!

Archiving

The first method is archiving.  This is automated process where Outlook automatically moves mails over a certain age into a separate folder. You need to set it up but after that it basically runs by itself without intervention.

The advantages of this method are that once it is set up you don’t need to worry about it (Outlook does it automatically) and that the process happens relatively seamlessly and you should not notice any appreciable loss in speed while it takes place.

The main disadvantage of archiving is that it your mails are split over two or more areas, so if you are hunting for a specific mail message you’ll need to look in more than one place.

If you use archiving it is still important that you check the archive size once in a while to make sure it hasn’t grown too big. Archive files are no different to any other type of mail file and they can explode just as easily if not monitored and kept in check. In order to avoid your archive file growing out control we suggest that you create and use a new one each year.

Multiple PST files

The other main way of dealing with mail is to work on a divide and conquer principle and split all your emails over several PST files.  Outlook allows you to use and view multiple PST files at any time – you are not limited to just one.

This means that you can store all emails relative to a particular subject together – for example all mails to and from a particular supplier or about a particular project.  You can even set up rules within Outlook to automatically file mails into the correct areas.  This means that (providing you remember the theory you used to file it!) you can easily track down a specific mail regardless of when you received it.

This total control of where emails end up is probably the biggest advantage of the multiple PST file approach.  The main disadvantage is probably that the process isn’t automatic – but whether that really is a disadvantage probably depends on how you like to work and organise your emails.

With this method you will still have to keep an eye on the size of your PST files, but by dividing your mail like this you got much better control and it’s far less likely that your email PST files will exceed the 2GB limit.

Logging in to your Outlook to be either confronted with warning messages or, worse still, corrupted data files or missing emails, is something that can strike terror into anyone.

In this post we look at the single most important check you can make to help avoid this happening  to you – and (in our next post) what to do if the warnings are already there.  It is based on Microsoft Outlook, but a lot of the information holds true for other email clients too – though the ways of doing things will of course we different.

Also, the information below applies only if you download your email messages into local files rather than keeping them all on the mail server.  If you don’t know which applies in your case, then please ask whoever deals with your IT internally.  Or us!

First of all, let’s identify the number one cause of these problems – and how to check if you might be affected.

Outlook can only cope with Data Files (Personal Folders and Archive files) up to a certain size.
…. if they are bigger, then it is a case of when (not if) disaster will occur

• If the files have been created in the newer format (not 97-2002 compatible) using the most recent version of Outlook (2007) or the most recent Service Packed version of Outlook 2003 (SP3 or above) then you can have files up to 20GB
• If any of the files were created in an earlier version, even if you are using the most recent version now, the absolute maximum size of any file is 2GB.  In practice any file over 1.8GB is highly likely to cause problems soon (if it hasn’t already) so you should take steps now to reduce it.

If you are not 100% sure which version of Outlook you have, then the easiest way to find out is to click on Help -> About Microsoft Outlook.  The window that pops up will tell you the version (and Service Pack) you are running.

But unless you have only recently created your Outlook profile and files from scratch, there is a fair chance that you may be working with files created with the older restrictions – so unless you are 100% sure, stick to the 1.8GB limit.

To find out what size your Outlook data files are:

• Look at the file size by browsing to the area(s) where they are stored in My Computer

or

• Right-Click on the top level of the folder in the left-hand Outlook pane
  Choose Properties
  Click on the Folder Size button and wait for your machine to count up the total

If you are not used to checking computer file sizes, the number of digits can get a bit confusing – let alone working out how many KB or MB in a GB!

Normally the results are displayed in KB.  If your file size is less than 1 800 000 KB (add another 0 to this if you are sure you are using files created in the latest version) then you should be ok for now.  But if it is close to or more than that, you need to take action immediately if you are to avoid huge problems later.

And remember, if you have more than one data file (including archive files) you will need to check each one separately.

And if any of your files are to big, what do you do next?

First of all make sure that you have deleted anything in your Deleted Items folder – unless your Outlook is set up to do this automatically on exit (which by default it isn’t) then there may be hundreds of files in there.

But there are other more long-term ways of re-arranging how your email files are stored to keep the folder sizes down.  We will cover some of the most common options next time.

Any comments or queries … or suggestions for follow up topics that you would like us to cover? Just leave a comment or contact us (details on the About Us page) and we will do our best to help.

Being able to work from home in comfortable surroundings or having the ability to access your work computer files while away from the office used to be an expensive luxury not within easy reach of your typical small organisation. However, many organisations, large and small, now can have some form or another of remote access to their network without having to break the bank.

Simply put, remote access is a service that provides access to information and applications on your network from locations other than your normal place of work.

Many technologies are on the market to enable this kind of access, including:

• Software – either included with operating system or purchased separately
• Web-based applications
• Blackberries
• Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs)

Over the next few blogs we shall be looking at the pros and cons of various types of remote access available and which ones are potentially the most beneficial to organisations without huge IT resources or budgets.

Take Skype for example. Skype – and other similar services such as Gizmo – allow users to make telephone calls over the internet to other users of the same service free of charge. This communication method has its benefits although there are a few potential downsides that you need to consider as well.

Services such as Skype are fast gaining in popularity. Calling between computers both using the chosen service is completely free, obviously an appealing feature to many people. Most of the services also offer the ability to call “normal” telephone numbers (mobile or land lines) at fairly competitive rates – often really competitive for international calls. Some providers also provide an additional service that (for a monthly or yearly fee) provides you with an incoming phone number. This is a fantastic way to get a number in (depending on the provider) the town or country you want – giving you a pseudo-presence there and making it cheaper for you colleagues, or supporters in that area to call you.

However, though the services are generally reliable, we would not advise relying on them as your only method of telephony – incoming or outgoing. If the service does fail (as happened for several days last year to many SkypeIn users for example) you will be left without any method of telephone contact – which not only will cause major inconvenience but does little for your professional profile.

According to the majority of users the audio is generally superb but the big question is really is it secure to use in an office environment? Each provider will have their own individual security features, so let’s take Skype as an example.

When calling Skype to Skype the calls are strongly encrypted so therefore at the higher end in the security stakes compared to other things that use the internet. If using Skype to call to mobile or landlines however, the calls are only encrypted for the Skype portion and not when they hit the public domain. This is fine if you have offices dotted about the country, or world, and you can implement a company-wide policy of Skype usage between offices, but if you are a smaller organisation mainly communicating with customers using a regular landline/mobile service you cannot guarantee the complete security of the conversations. This is not to say that using Skype is more of a threat to charities than other ‘techie’ tools, such as email, but because Skype is newer the vulnerabilities may not be as well known.

Compliance and protection of information within organisations is also a hot topic these days. Organisations need not only to know what information is entering and leaving the office but also to log and archive it as well. It is difficult for third party applications (ie monitoring tools) to interface with Skype. This makes it very difficult to know exactly what information is entering or leaving the organisation. Sensitive information could be passed on with no way of tracking where and from whom it originated.

Perhaps the answer is not to ban Skype flat-out but if you are going to consider its use, then control it – as you do with email. Policies on acceptable usage, such as no file transfers, and cautions against using it for sensitive communications, should be written and enforced.

Any comments, queries or suggestions for follow up topics that you would like us to cover? Just leave a comment or contact us (details on the About Us page) and we will do our best to help.

This is a pretty complex subject for a single blog entry – and as with anything to do with security and technology, things are changing all the time – but here are some pointers for you to consider when making your decision.

IM can be handy as a means to communicate very quickly when situations require. The ‘real time’ aspect of messaging is appealing to many as it can save huge amounts of time if you require advice or an opinion in a hurry – without the cost of a telephone call. You can’t get faster than instant!   Also, as most IM software is available as a free download so it’s unarguably a cost-effective communication tool.

But, it is also undeniably an easy way for people to chat about non-work related subjects, or even moan about work in general. It’s not really the done thing in offices these days for people to sit at their desk and chat on the phone to friends. However, chatting on IM is a means for people to do the same thing without getting caught. Co-workers and supervisors may assume the person was discussing serious work matters but in practice it could actually be plans for the weekend or the latest episode of EastEnders!

It may be quick and convenient but is it secure? Different IM applications use different protocols and standard firewalls may not block or detect them. Some IM clients can use ports other than those associated with IM even commonly open ports such as 80 (normally associated with web browsing).

IM programs such as AIM, Yahoo and MSN Messenger pose additional possible security issues. These programs often allow more than just chat: they allow file transfers as well. Not only could users send documents – a recent study revealed that around 32% of companies have found employees passing confidential information to a third party – but users can also receive files that may possibly contain viruses or malicious code. Not to mention the liability nightmare if employees use the file transfer feature to share copyrighted music, movie or software files in violation of the law.

Is there an answer without an all-out ban? It could be a simple case of allowing one type of IM to be used over another. There are two basic types of IM technologies: peer to peer (P2P) and client-server. With a P2P system, IM clients communicate with each other directly hence they are less secure as there is no centralised control. With a client-server system, communications go through a central IM server from which it is passed on to the recipient. With client-server systems, IM communications can be monitored and logged at a central location (which also conforms to current compliance regulations). Not only do you have an audit trail but employees will be deterred from engaging in non-work related chit-chat and file swapping if they know they could be found out and held accountable!

Many places already have employees using IM at work, and the automatic assumption – that it cannot be used safely or is hindering productivity and therefore should be blocked – is probably unfair. Used and monitored properly, IM can be a great tool – but, like most other modern tools, it does need to be controlled and monitored if you are to ensure that productivity doesn’t suffer and that your network and data is to be kept secure. Like most other things out there, you just need to know what you are dealing with and know how to control it.

Any comments, queries or suggestions for follow up topics that you would like us to cover? Just leave a comment or contact us (details on the About Us page) and we will do our best to help.

First of all, forget about the hype and get back to basics. Remember the recycling mantra:

• - Reduce
• - Reuse
• - Recycle

Reduce is an easy one. Ensuring your computers and printers are shut down at night and not just left on standby will cut down on wasteful power consumption and immediately improve your green footprint. Remember to also switch off monitors when not in use – you can adjust the settings to switch off after a certain period of inactivity. Laptops (and even some PCs) can be set to go into a standby lower power mode if not used for a set period.

Reducing your office paper consumption is another hot issue. You could use less by using both sides and thinking before you print – do you really need ten copies in full colour? Using cheaper low-grade or recycled paper for general use and keeping high-quality paper usage to a minimum is another simple green solution.

Also, don’t forget that a lot of the simple greener changes you have probably already made at home can be carried over into the office – like using low energy bulbs and rechargeable batteries.

Reuse your IT equipment for as long as it is practical and economical. Upgrade only when extra features, speed or processing power is essential – or if the equipment is particularly old and “power hungry”. Some organisations use snazzy new computers that are far more powerful than necessary to run simple office applications. Older machines with less powerful processors could simply be fitted with additional memory or bigger hard disks to remain in service. If you do need a new computer, check the manufacturers website to how green (both in terms of power consumption and the components used) – and when choosing a manufacturer, consult independent organisations such as Greenpeace (www.greenpeace.org/electronics) who regularly monitor how well the main manufacturers are truly doing on the green front or visit the EPEAT website (www.epeat.net) where an increading number of PCs, notebooks and monitors are evaluated and scored according to set environmental criteria.

Think about refilling rather than discarding your printer cartridges. (But take care to check manufacturers warranty if your printer is new because sometimes use of third-party consumables can lead to warranty exclusions.) National companies such as Cartridge World have outlets across the UK where you can take your empty cartridges to be refilled. Or, if you prefer, you can also buy special kits and refill the cartridges yourself – though this can get messy and isn’t always particularly successful. By reusing your cartridges you will not only help save landfill space but you can save money.

Recycle! Under the European Union’s Waste Electrical and Electronic (WEEE) Directive, all manufacturers of electrical equipment are responsible for its environmentally friendly disposal, and the infrastructure required for collection. This allows old equipment to be reused and recycled where possible, with any potentially hazardous components properly disposed of. Your IT supplier may well have facilities in place to recycle your old equipment, if not consult your local council website or national one like www.recyclenow.co.uk.

Once again, the recycling efforts you probably make at home can be reproduced in the office. Don’t forget that not only can your waste paper be recycled, but cans, bottles, cardboard or even plastics. It might not be as easy or cheap (unlike the private house refuse collection facilities provided by councils, most commercial waste collectors will only provide recycling collection at an additional cost) but with a bit or organisation it can be done – and a bottle or can recycled from your office will save just as much energy and resources as one from home.

There are many green options available for smaller organisations and even small changes can make a difference to the environment – and also to your finances. Here are some links you may find useful:

www.netregs.gov.uk – Waste Legislation Information

www.itsnoteasybeinggreen.org/forum – Internet forum with ‘green office’ ideas (amongst many other green topics)

www.donateapc.org – “matchmaking” service for people wanting to get rid of old IT equipment and people wanting to recycle it

www.globalactionplan.org.uk – helping organisations reduce their environmental impact.

www.greenpeace.org/electronics – highlights green IT issues and produces regular reports of how much manufacturers are truly doing to be greener

www.epeat.net - contains details of of PCs, notebooks and monitors that have been evaluated and scored according to set environmental criteria

www.recyclenow.co.uk – website is dedicated to raising recycling awareness and promoting responsible waste management

Any questions or comments?  Or any useful websites you would like to see added to our list?  Just leave a comment or contact us (details on the About Us page) and we will do our best to help.

Anti-spam solutions can basically be broken down into two types – hosted and in-house.

Hosted solution

A hosted solution routes your mail to your chosen service provider who scans then delivers it your own mail server. Those wishing to contact you will do so via your usual email address and you continue to send email as normal. The only difference is that your anti-spam service will automatically check and process your email so that all you should receive is clean mail, free of spam and viruses. This will considerably cut down on the amount of mail that your mail server has to receive – and with up to 98% of all current emails being reported to be spam, that can make a considerable dent on the bandwidth you will need from your ISP.

Because a hosted solution provider is monitoring so many emails, it is best placed to see new spam trends developing and so is generally quickest to put new measures into place as new waves of spam arrive. It will also scan mail through multiple anti-virus solutions, from various vendors, so you can normally expect better protection.

Of course the best bit is you don’t have to worry about managing the spam yourself (also taking away the worry of added costs) – the anti-spam provider will assume these responsibilities on your behalf and, since you will normally be paying monthly or yearly for their services, it is in their best interest to make sure they do the job well!

In-House Solutions

An in-house solution is one that is installed at your own offices that you administer yourself (or get someone to do for you). The solution could be software-based (either one piece of central software that scans all emails – normally before they get to your mail server, or software that is installed on each person’s individual PC) or it can be a complete hardware “box” (containing its own software) that you plug into your network.

As in-house solutions require administering, you will need to take into account that managing the spam yourself will take time and may result in additional costs. Also, in-house systems must wait for updates to be released from the system’s manufacturer and so could be slower to be updated with the latest protection. Then there is human error, which means that there is the possibility that available updates and patches can go uninstalled.

But on the plus side, if you don’t need a complicated “bells and whistles” anti-spam solution, you may well be able to get an in-house solution cheaper than a hosted one. And, in time, you will have a much better idea of the type and level of spam that is coming into your organisation – and how to deal with it.

Do you need it to be customisable?

Depending on your specific needs, the level of customisation offered may be an important factor when choosing a solution. Some solutions (both hosted and in-house) are more customisable than others. For example, if your organisation’s area of working means that you receive legitimate messages containing on ‘spam-popular’ words (concerned with debt reduction or pharmaceutical names for example), you might ideally want to look for a solution that gives the ability to let emails containing words in those specific areas through rather than immediately label them as spam.

There are also solutions that allow more flexibility at user level – so that the spam protection for some email addresses can be set to be more or less sensitive than others. So it is wise to think whether your organizations areas of work or working methods mean that your requirements are not best covered by a “one size fits all” solution.

Whatever type of solution you choose, you do need to be aware that no anti-spam solution, whether hosted or in-house, will be 100% accurate. From time to time it is possible that a genuine email will be classified as spam, or that spam will sneak past the filter, so you will still need to check your quarantined spam area regularly – and if the solution you choose includes a simple way of doing this, it will make your life easier.

So, to summarise:

• - Think about the emails your organisation receives and decide what level of customisation (if any) you are going to need from your anti-spam solution.
• - Consider how much time and expertise you have within your organisation to administer an anti-spam solution.
• - Work out the volume of email you receive and the proportion of the current total that is spam. If your ISP currently handles your mail, remember to factor in the additional bandwidth that will be taken up with spam when your ISP’s anti-spam protection is no longer in place – and any costs involved with that extra bandwidth. (Does your ISP charge you more if you go over a monthly limit?)

In the end, as with most things (particularly in IT!) it will probably come down to balancing the features you want or need with the budget and time you have at your disposal. But hopefully the information here will help you to make a more informed choice. And if you are still confused, leave a comment or contact us (details on the About Us page) and we will do our best to help.